Post-Harvest Crop Residue Management

Erick Larson, State Extension Specialist - Grain Crops
By Erick Larson, State Extension Specialist - Grain Crops September 26, 2011 17:34

Post-Harvest Crop Residue Management

After harvest, you face management decisions as you begin preparing fields for next year’s crop.  Following a corn crop, many Mississippi growers face substantial shock because corn produces far more crop residue than the traditional staples – cotton and soybeans.  Historically, growers perceive this residue as “trash” or a problem which must be destroyed by fire or tillage.  However, crop residue generated in crop rotation systems can produce substantial long-term benefits which are likely to far outweigh any short-term savings accomplished by destroying residue, particularly since our Mississippi soils are naturally low in organic matter.  Kip Cullers, a Missouri farmer who is the current world record holder for soybean yield (160.6 bu/a) and National Corn Growers Association yield contest winner says when asked about burning corn residue, “My opinion is that the soil benefits from the return of both root tissue and above-ground crop residues. We rarely use field burning in our high-yield fields. We do everything we can to maintain or increase the amount of organic matter in our soils.”

Burning crop residue eliminates a precious opportunity to improve organic matter content and potentially can lead to substantial nutrient loss.  Nearly all nitrogen and at least 75% of sulfur contained in plant residues will be lost upon combustion.  Although phosphorus and potash are not theoretically lost due to residue combustion, considerable loss will realistically occur from smoke and ash that are not recoverable or recycled into the soil.  This can result from wind and subsequent rainfall.  Therefore, if you don’t perform a tillage operation for several weeks after burning a field, the nutrients contained in the ash will likely be displaced from or redistributed in your field.  This can cause considerable fertility limitations with the next crop. The nutrient replacement cost associated could be as much as $150 per acre for phosphate and potash loss alone, from losing the residue of a high-yielding corn crop.

Crop residues and resultant higher soil organic matter improve many soil properties which may considerably enhance crop productivity.  Additional organic matter affects soils by:

  • Improving soil tilth
  • Improving soil water holding capability
  • Improving water infiltration
  • Improving nutrient availability
  • Reducing evaporation
  • Reducing soil erosion

These properties improve plant root development and greatly enhance plant health, particularly during droughty periods.   In other words, residue recycling can better accomplish many of the same goals we annually attempt to temporarily fix using deep and/or intensive tillage.  

Building soil organic matter level is a long-term process, which should be a primary management goal for southern producers.  Our warm, moist environment inherently limits native soil organic matter levels in our region, because it encourages rapid organic decomposition.  Tillage also accelerates decomposition, which restricts soil organic matter improvement.  Since corn generally produces much more crop residue than traditional crops, you have an exceptional opportunity to improve your soil properties and crop productivity in coming years.

A primary tillage tool designed to chop stalks, deep rip, and establish raised beds in a single operation can save considerable time and fuel expense, compared to several conventional tillage operations.

Equipment manufacturers now produce improved planters and planter residue managers specifically designed for use in heavy corn residue.  These equipment improvements have facilitated widespread adoption of reduced tillage systems, allowing more opportunity to realize the benefits crop residue offer.  Therefore, we encourage you to try new methods and/or minimal tillage on some acres – let mother-nature decompose those stalks over the winter, rather than burning diesel or stalks.

Print Friendly

Erick Larson, State Extension Specialist - Grain Crops
By Erick Larson, State Extension Specialist - Grain Crops September 26, 2011 17:34
Write a comment

No Comments

No Comments Yet!

Let me tell You a sad story ! There are no comments yet, but You can be first one to comment this article.

Write a comment
View comments

Write a comment

Your e-mail address will not be published.
Required fields are marked*

Subscribe to receive updates

  • 2015 Delta Area Rice Growers Meeting: November 5, 2015

    The 2015 Delta area/Bolivar Co. Rice Meeting will be held at the Bolivar Co. Extension office on November 5, 2015. Mississippi rice producers, industry professionals, and other interested parties are ...
  • 2015 Rice On-Farm Variety Trial Preliminary Data

    Find below the Preliminary version of the 2015 On-Farm Rice Variety Trial. During 2015, small plot rice variety trials were conducted near the following locations; Choctaw, Clarksdale, Hollandale, Ruleville, Shaw, ...
  • 2015 MSU Short List of Suggested Wheat Varieties

    This publication lists those wheat varieties which have demonstrated superior productivity in the Mississippi Wheat and Oat Variety Trials and summarizes their characteristics. This impartial information should help you better assess wheat varieties which are best suited for your farm. ...
  • 2015 Cotton Varieties Planted Report

    The United States Department of Agriculture – Agriculture Marketing Service released the 2015 Cotton Varieties Planted Report on September 15, 2015.  Mississippi cotton growers planted 29% of the total state ...
  • Are Late-Season Soybean Rust Observations Important?

    Late-season soybean rust observations occur on almost an annual basis. Even though the majority of the soybean crop has escaped yield loss as a result of soybean rust again for the 2015 season, determining the extent of the disease in MS as well as potential locations where the fungus could overwinter continue to be an important part of the ...
  • Burning Stalks – What does it Really Cost?

    After harvest, you immediately face management decisions as you begin preparing fields for next year's crop. Corn produces far more residue than most crops we are accustomed to, so it can cause considerable benefits or anxiety depending upon how you view it. This article addresses the pro's and con's of crop residue and associated management options, including burning. ...

More Info By